This post is a continuation of a previous one. I have developed several preparatory (in preparation of other) claims or theorems: The first and second claim show that a particular collection of finite polynomial functions have area of 1 in the interval , and are hence also Pasquali patches. The third and fourth shows that the finite sum of any such functions actually have converging integrals in the same interval. The corollaries show that this is not the case if the sum is infinite. A fun way to summarize this information is soon after developed, and these observations, though simple, lead us to classify all Pasquali patches which are functions of alone, and therefore all stationary/limiting/stable surfaces, eigenfunctions or wavevectors (from the quantum mechanics point-of-view).

**Claim 1.** Take with . Then .

**Proof by Definition of Integration (Inducing).** We show that . The expression equals

We assume that the

th element

although we readily know by the definition of integration that such is true, since

The exact same definition argument applies to the

th element and

**Claim 2.** The functions with are Pasquali patches.

**Proof.** A Pasquali patch is a function so that . Let . Since by Claim 1 , then applying the definition means are Pasquali patches .

**Claim 3.** The finite polynomial converges in area from to .

**Proof.** We are looking for

. The sum is finite so it converges, and there is no issue exchanging the order of the sum and integral. Thus:

**Claim 4.** Pick functions from the pool of . For example, pick , and . Create the function . Then .

**Proof by induction.** Since by Claim 2 all are Pasquali patches, it follows their integral is in the interval (Claim 1). Picking 1 function from the pool thus gives an integral of 1 in the interval. Suppose that picking functions gives units at the integral in the interval. Now pick functions. The first functions give units at the integral in the interval, and the 1 additional function contributes 1 unit at the integral in the interval. Thus functions contribute units at the integral in the interval.

**Corollary 1.** The infinite polynomial diverges in area in the interval from .

**Proof.** Take

Here exchanging the order of limit and integral is justified by the fact that, term-wise, the integral converges. Next

Here the second to last step is justified by Claim 3.

**Corollary 2.** The infinite polynomial diverges in area in the interval from .

**Proof.** Take the limit

Taking n to infinity applies to

only which we know diverges by Corollary 1. The same limit has no effect on

as the sum it is composed of is finite and adds up to an integer constant, say

. We conclude that any infinite collection of terms of

diverges, even when a finite number of them may be absent from the sum.

And now sushi.

**Corollary 3.** The infinite polynomial diverges in area in the interval from with are infinite polynomials constructed by sums of functions picked from the pool and with no repetitions. (Note that the difference of these two infinite polynomials must also be infinite).

**Proof.** Since the is an infinite polynomial, the integral of such will be an infinite string of ones since the functions it contains are and these are Pasquali patches (Claim 2) and there are no repetitions. Such infinite sum of ones clearly diverges.

**Remark 1.** We can view what we have learned in the claims from a slightly different vantage point. Create the infinite identity matrix

Next create the following polynomial differential vector

It is clear that

for all rows

of

. We can omit the little

because this definition applies to all rows and:

This of course summarizes Claims 1 and 2. Next, define the matrix

consisting of rows which are finite sums of rows of

(so that each row of

consists of a finite number of ones at any position, namely

such coming from

picked rows of

). Claims 3 and 4 are summarized in the statement

where

is the vector consisting of the sum of the rows of

, which, since it is made up of a finite number of ones at each row, adds up to a constant integer at each row:

Finally, the corollaries can be summarized in the statement in which we create a matrix

consisting of rows with a finite number of zeroes (and an infinite number of ones) or an infinite number of zeroes but an infinite number of ones as well. It is clear then that

**Remark 2.** The cool thing about this notation is that it gives us power to conclude several interesting things. For example, scaling of matrices and as by a constant shows convergence at the integral in the interval of every one of the scaled sums represented by the rows of such matrices. Thus:

**Corollary 4.** Let and with is a scaling factor. Then the area of each of the infinitely many polynomials represented by the matrices dot in the interval from 0 to 1 converge.

**Proof.** On the one hand, we have

On the other hand,

**Remark 3.** Next consider the infinite-matrix formed by convergent sequences (at the sum) at each row,

Depicted is the reciprocals of squares which we know converges at the sum (Basel problem), simply for illustration, but all convergent sequences would be in the

th row of

. We have

is convergent by definition. The cool thing is we can easily prove in one swoop that all sequences that are scaled will also converge at the sum (and the infinite polynomials with coefficients

have converging area in the interval from 0 to 1).

**Corollary 5.** Let with is a scaling factor. Then the area of each of the infinitely many polynomials represented by the matrix entries of in the interval from 0 to 1 converge.

**Proof.** We have

for all

, so this equals

for all

.

All of these small and obvious observations lead to this:

**Claim 5. The Grand Classification Theorem of Limiting Surfaces (A General and Absolutely Complete Classification of Pasquali patches which are functions of alone).** All Pasquali patches which are functions of alone (and therefore possible limiting surfaces) take the form

**Proof.** We have that, since such is a Pasquali patch, it must conform to the definition. Thus

shows this is indeed the case. To show that "all" Pasquali patches that are functions of

alone are of the form of

, we argue by contradiction. Suppose that there is a Pasquali patch that is a function of

alone which does not take the form of

. It couldn't possibly be one such that is a finite polynomial, since

was defined to be that matrix formed by all convergent sequences at the sum at each row and it can be scaled any which way we like, and this includes sequences with a finite number of nonzero coefficients. But now it couldn't be any infinite polynomial either, by the same definition of

which includes infinite sequences so that

is convergent. Thus it must be a polynomial formed by dotting divergent sequences (at the sum), but all such have been happily excluded from the definition of

.

**Remark 4.** Thus, EVERY convergent series has an associated Pasquali patch (which is solely a function of ), and vice versa, covering the totality of the Pasquali patch functions of universe and the convergent series universe bijectively.

**Remark 5.** Notice how the definition takes into account Taylor polynomial coefficients (thus all analytic functions are included) and those that are not (even those that are as yet unclassified), and all sequences which may be scaled by a factor as well.

**Claim 6.** Let is Maclaurin-expandable so that

Then

**Proof.**

for some

row of

. Such a row would have to be of form

Then the integral

**Remark 6.** Notice that all Maclaurin-expandable functions converge in area (have stable area) in the interval from 0 to 1, a remarkable fact.

**Example 1.** Take

By applying

**Claim 6**, it follows that

**Remark 7.** Now we have a happy way to construct (any and all) Pasquali patches which are functions of alone, merely by taking a sequence which is convergent at the sum.

**Remark 8.** Quantum mechanically, we now know all possible shapes that a stationary (limiting) eigen wavevector can take.

**Remark 9.** This gives us extraordinary power to calculate convergent sums via integration, as the next examples show. It also gives us extraordinary power to express any number as an infinite sum, for example.